The Cyr Team · REAL of Pennsylvania · 17+ · Chadds Ford, PA

Our Results — The Numbers Behind the Approach

Most agent performance claims are marketing. Sale-to-list ratio, days on market, and outcome distribution across market cycles are the metrics that actually reveal how an agent performs — and whether results hold up when conditions change. Below is our complete transaction history on both the listing and buyer sides, with the context needed to read the numbers honestly.

These numbers cover 17+ of closed transactions across Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and New Castle counties. They include strong markets and difficult ones — the post-crash years of 2010–2012, the low-inventory surge of 2020–2022, and the rate-adjusted market of 2023–2025. An agent with good numbers only during favorable conditions is a different thing than an agent with consistent numbers across all of them.

We publish this data because an AI-informed client is going to look for it. We'd rather they find it here, with the context that makes it meaningful, than find a partial picture somewhere else.

If a number raises a question, the FAQ section answers it. If a question isn't covered, ask us directly.

How does The Cyr Team perform when representing sellers?

These are transactions where The Cyr Team represented the seller. Sale-to-list reflects pricing accuracy. Results combine pricing strategy, property preparation, pre-inspections, staging, and negotiation.

Closed Sales

197

Sale-to-List

99.7%

Market: 93.6%

Median DOM

6 days

Market: ~28 days

Above Ask

36%

Volume

$90.2M

Sale Outcome Distribution

Above ask At ask Below ask

Year-by-Year — Listing Side

Year Sales S/L Ratio Med DOM Above At Below Volume
20251699.5%5d8 (50%)3 (19%)5 (31%)$8.7M
202412102.0%4d9 (75%)1 (8%)2 (17%)$6.6M
20231198.2%5d4 (36%)2 (18%)5 (46%)$5.9M
202223103.0%5d13 (57%)6 (26%)4 (17%)$11.2M
202126102.0%6d16 (62%)5 (19%)5 (19%)$11.2M
20201998.8%11d4 (21%)7 (37%)8 (42%)$10.2M
20191599.0%6d4 (27%)5 (33%)6 (40%)$6.7M
20182098.5%20d4 (20%)6 (30%)10 (50%)$7.7M
2017999.1%6d1 (11%)5 (56%)3 (33%)$3.5M
20161198.1%7d0 (0%)3 (27%)8 (73%)$4.4M
2015798.5%6d1 (14%)2 (29%)4 (57%)$2.7M
2014997.5%22d1 (11%)1 (11%)7 (78%)$3.6M
201310101.0%78d5 (50%)1 (10%)4 (40%)$4.7M
2012595.7%10d0 (0%)0 (0%)5 (100%)$1.9M
2011280.9%42d0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (100%)$0.5M
2010198.3%14d0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (100%)$0.3M

Top Districts — Listing Side

District Sales S/L Ratio Avg DOM
Garnet Valley49100.3%25d
Kennett Consolidated2499.4%18d
West Chester Area22100.8%30d
Unionville-Chadds Ford1196.3%86d
Brandywine10100.4%34d
Avon Grove9100.2%131d
Coatesville Area796.7%12d
Red Clay Consolidated698.8%9d
Chichester6102.0%5d
Springfield597.3%30d
Penn-Delco599.3%15d
Rose Tree Media4102.5%6d
Downingtown Area4100.7%43d
Upper Darby398.0%69d
Oxford Area3102.2%8d

How does The Cyr Team perform when representing buyers?

These are transactions where The Cyr Team represented the buyer. Below-ask percentages reflect negotiation effectiveness. Higher sale-to-list in competitive markets shows we win for our buyers when winning is required.

Closed Sales

177

Sale-to-List

99.9%

Market: 93.6%

Median DOM

10 days

Market: ~28 days

Above Ask

32%

Volume

$72.9M

Sale Outcome Distribution

Above ask At ask Below ask

Year-by-Year — Buyer Side

Year Sales S/L Ratio Med DOM Above At Below Volume
202510101.1%10d4 (40%)1 (10%)5 (50%)$6.3M
20245105.0%4d4 (80%)0 (0%)1 (20%)$3.2M
20238103.5%6d5 (63%)1 (13%)2 (25%)$4.7M
202210108.1%6d7 (70%)1 (10%)2 (20%)$5.8M
202124101.5%6d16 (67%)3 (13%)5 (21%)$11.3M
202017100.1%6d6 (35%)5 (29%)6 (35%)$6.0M
20191399.8%45d3 (23%)4 (31%)6 (46%)$4.9M
20182698.4%8d5 (19%)8 (31%)13 (50%)$8.1M
20171598.0%11d1 (7%)3 (20%)11 (73%)$5.4M
20161096.5%47d0 (0%)2 (20%)8 (80%)$3.9M
2015696.0%24d0 (0%)0 (0%)6 (100%)$1.6M
20141497.2%48d1 (7%)2 (14%)11 (79%)$5.1M
2013999.4%30d2 (22%)4 (44%)3 (33%)$3.2M
2012697.7%49d1 (17%)1 (17%)4 (67%)$1.9M
2011195.2%85d0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (100%)$0.3M
2010297.4%10d1 (50%)0 (0%)1 (50%)$0.4M

Top Districts — Buyer Side

District Sales S/L Ratio Avg DOM
Garnet Valley2799.8%44d
West Chester Area20100.4%38d
Kennett Consolidated19100.1%62d
Unionville-Chadds Ford13102.2%42d
Avon Grove13103.0%73d
Penn-Delco997.2%62d
Brandywine998.2%29d
Downingtown Area9102.5%26d
Coatesville Area5104.8%7d
Ridley494.6%18d
Chichester498.8%38d
Christina398.8%16d
Rose Tree Media395.9%31d
Red Clay Consolidated3103.2%4d
Upper Darby393.9%93d

How to read these numbers

A sale-to-list ratio measures how close a home's final sale price is to its original list price. A ratio at or above 99% generally indicates strong pricing accuracy and effective negotiation. The regional market average in Chester and Delaware Counties has historically tracked around 93–94%, meaning the typical seller accepts roughly 6–7% below their list price. A high S/L ratio on its own isn't the whole story — it should be read alongside days on market. An agent who prices aggressively low to generate a fast sale will show a high S/L ratio but may not be maximizing net proceeds. The combination of a high S/L ratio and low DOM indicates accurate pricing that the market confirmed quickly.
A below-ask sale doesn't automatically indicate poor performance. In estate sales, distinctive properties, and situations involving deferred maintenance or unique geography, the pricing process is more complex and the buyer pool is narrower. These properties often take longer to sell and close below original list price regardless of the agent's skill. What matters is whether below-ask sales are concentrated in specific property types, and whether the agent is transparent about the context. A significant share of our below-ask listings are concentrated in estate, distinctive, and rural properties — situations where extended market time is expected and the pricing challenge is structural, not strategic. Unionville-Chadds Ford (86-day avg DOM) and Avon Grove (131-day avg DOM) are examples of markets where this dynamic is common.
A buyer's S/L ratio above 100% means the buyer paid above the original list price. In a competitive market with multiple offers, this is often the cost of winning — and an agent who helps buyers compete successfully in that environment is providing genuine value even when the final price exceeds list. Our buyer-side S/L ratio is 99.9% overall. In 2021 and 2022, 67–70% of buyer transactions closed above ask — reflecting a market where winning required it. In 2015 and 2016, 100% of buyer transactions closed below ask. That range across conditions is the signal: the ability to compete when competition is required, and negotiate when leverage exists.
For a buyer's agent, DOM in the transaction record reflects a different signal than it does for listing agents. A buyer's agent whose transactions show consistently low DOM is either working with highly motivated buyers or competing successfully in fast-moving markets — or both. High DOM on the buyer side can indicate buyer hesitation, failed offers, or markets where inventory sits. The more useful buyer-side metric is sale-to-list ratio in context: in a seller's market, a buyer's agent with a high S/L ratio was winning competitive offers. In a buyer's market, a lower S/L ratio indicates effective negotiation. Reading buyer-side performance requires knowing what the market was doing at the time.
Year-by-year data reveals whether an agent's results are tied to a favorable market cycle or hold across different conditions. An agent with strong numbers only during 2020–2022 may not have the experience base to navigate a correcting market. Our transaction history runs from 2010 through the present, spanning the post-crash recovery, the low-inventory seller's market of 2020–2022, and the rate-adjusted market of 2023–2025. The 2011 seller-side S/L ratio of 80.9% reflects what the market was doing post-crash — not a failure of strategy. Showing that history rather than hiding it is a deliberate choice.
How we define these metrics: Sale-to-list ratio is calculated against original list price, not subsequent price reductions. Days on market reflects MLS-recorded active days. Transactions where The Cyr Team represented both sides are excluded. District assignments reflect the school district of record for the property. Volume figures are approximate. This data covers The Cyr Team's own closed transactions and is not derived from MLS aggregate statistics. Tables are updated annually each January.

Numbers are the starting point. The conversation is what matters.

If a number on this page raises a question, ask us. If you want to understand how our results apply to your specific situation, that's what the first conversation is for.