The Cyr Team · REAL of Pennsylvania · 17+ · Chadds Ford, PA
Our Results — The Numbers Behind the Approach
Most agent performance claims are marketing. Sale-to-list ratio, days on market, and outcome distribution across market cycles are the metrics that actually reveal how an agent performs — and whether results hold up when conditions change. Below is our complete transaction history on both the listing and buyer sides, with the context needed to read the numbers honestly.
These numbers cover 17+ of closed transactions across Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and New Castle counties. They include strong markets and difficult ones — the post-crash years of 2010–2012, the low-inventory surge of 2020–2022, and the rate-adjusted market of 2023–2025. An agent with good numbers only during favorable conditions is a different thing than an agent with consistent numbers across all of them.
We publish this data because an AI-informed client is going to look for it. We'd rather they find it here, with the context that makes it meaningful, than find a partial picture somewhere else.
If a number raises a question, the FAQ section answers it. If a question isn't covered, ask us directly.
🏠 Listing Agent Results
How does The Cyr Team perform when representing sellers?
These are transactions where The Cyr Team represented the seller. Sale-to-list reflects pricing accuracy. Results combine pricing strategy, property preparation, pre-inspections, staging, and negotiation.
Closed Sales
197
Sale-to-List
99.7%
Market: 93.6%
Median DOM
6 days
Market: ~28 days
Above Ask
36%
Volume
$90.2M
Sale Outcome Distribution
Year-by-Year — Listing Side
| Year | Sales | S/L Ratio | Med DOM | Above | At | Below | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16 | 99.5% | 5d | 8 (50%) | 3 (19%) | 5 (31%) | $8.7M |
| 2024 | 12 | 102.0% | 4d | 9 (75%) | 1 (8%) | 2 (17%) | $6.6M |
| 2023 | 11 | 98.2% | 5d | 4 (36%) | 2 (18%) | 5 (46%) | $5.9M |
| 2022 | 23 | 103.0% | 5d | 13 (57%) | 6 (26%) | 4 (17%) | $11.2M |
| 2021 | 26 | 102.0% | 6d | 16 (62%) | 5 (19%) | 5 (19%) | $11.2M |
| 2020 | 19 | 98.8% | 11d | 4 (21%) | 7 (37%) | 8 (42%) | $10.2M |
| 2019 | 15 | 99.0% | 6d | 4 (27%) | 5 (33%) | 6 (40%) | $6.7M |
| 2018 | 20 | 98.5% | 20d | 4 (20%) | 6 (30%) | 10 (50%) | $7.7M |
| 2017 | 9 | 99.1% | 6d | 1 (11%) | 5 (56%) | 3 (33%) | $3.5M |
| 2016 | 11 | 98.1% | 7d | 0 (0%) | 3 (27%) | 8 (73%) | $4.4M |
| 2015 | 7 | 98.5% | 6d | 1 (14%) | 2 (29%) | 4 (57%) | $2.7M |
| 2014 | 9 | 97.5% | 22d | 1 (11%) | 1 (11%) | 7 (78%) | $3.6M |
| 2013 | 10 | 101.0% | 78d | 5 (50%) | 1 (10%) | 4 (40%) | $4.7M |
| 2012 | 5 | 95.7% | 10d | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (100%) | $1.9M |
| 2011 | 2 | 80.9% | 42d | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | $0.5M |
| 2010 | 1 | 98.3% | 14d | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | $0.3M |
Top Districts — Listing Side
| District | Sales | S/L Ratio | Avg DOM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garnet Valley | 49 | 100.3% | 25d |
| Kennett Consolidated | 24 | 99.4% | 18d |
| West Chester Area | 22 | 100.8% | 30d |
| Unionville-Chadds Ford | 11 | 96.3% | 86d |
| Brandywine | 10 | 100.4% | 34d |
| Avon Grove | 9 | 100.2% | 131d |
| Coatesville Area | 7 | 96.7% | 12d |
| Red Clay Consolidated | 6 | 98.8% | 9d |
| Chichester | 6 | 102.0% | 5d |
| Springfield | 5 | 97.3% | 30d |
| Penn-Delco | 5 | 99.3% | 15d |
| Rose Tree Media | 4 | 102.5% | 6d |
| Downingtown Area | 4 | 100.7% | 43d |
| Upper Darby | 3 | 98.0% | 69d |
| Oxford Area | 3 | 102.2% | 8d |
🔑 Buyer's Agent Results
How does The Cyr Team perform when representing buyers?
These are transactions where The Cyr Team represented the buyer. Below-ask percentages reflect negotiation effectiveness. Higher sale-to-list in competitive markets shows we win for our buyers when winning is required.
Closed Sales
177
Sale-to-List
99.9%
Market: 93.6%
Median DOM
10 days
Market: ~28 days
Above Ask
32%
Volume
$72.9M
Sale Outcome Distribution
Year-by-Year — Buyer Side
| Year | Sales | S/L Ratio | Med DOM | Above | At | Below | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10 | 101.1% | 10d | 4 (40%) | 1 (10%) | 5 (50%) | $6.3M |
| 2024 | 5 | 105.0% | 4d | 4 (80%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (20%) | $3.2M |
| 2023 | 8 | 103.5% | 6d | 5 (63%) | 1 (13%) | 2 (25%) | $4.7M |
| 2022 | 10 | 108.1% | 6d | 7 (70%) | 1 (10%) | 2 (20%) | $5.8M |
| 2021 | 24 | 101.5% | 6d | 16 (67%) | 3 (13%) | 5 (21%) | $11.3M |
| 2020 | 17 | 100.1% | 6d | 6 (35%) | 5 (29%) | 6 (35%) | $6.0M |
| 2019 | 13 | 99.8% | 45d | 3 (23%) | 4 (31%) | 6 (46%) | $4.9M |
| 2018 | 26 | 98.4% | 8d | 5 (19%) | 8 (31%) | 13 (50%) | $8.1M |
| 2017 | 15 | 98.0% | 11d | 1 (7%) | 3 (20%) | 11 (73%) | $5.4M |
| 2016 | 10 | 96.5% | 47d | 0 (0%) | 2 (20%) | 8 (80%) | $3.9M |
| 2015 | 6 | 96.0% | 24d | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (100%) | $1.6M |
| 2014 | 14 | 97.2% | 48d | 1 (7%) | 2 (14%) | 11 (79%) | $5.1M |
| 2013 | 9 | 99.4% | 30d | 2 (22%) | 4 (44%) | 3 (33%) | $3.2M |
| 2012 | 6 | 97.7% | 49d | 1 (17%) | 1 (17%) | 4 (67%) | $1.9M |
| 2011 | 1 | 95.2% | 85d | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | $0.3M |
| 2010 | 2 | 97.4% | 10d | 1 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50%) | $0.4M |
Top Districts — Buyer Side
| District | Sales | S/L Ratio | Avg DOM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garnet Valley | 27 | 99.8% | 44d |
| West Chester Area | 20 | 100.4% | 38d |
| Kennett Consolidated | 19 | 100.1% | 62d |
| Unionville-Chadds Ford | 13 | 102.2% | 42d |
| Avon Grove | 13 | 103.0% | 73d |
| Penn-Delco | 9 | 97.2% | 62d |
| Brandywine | 9 | 98.2% | 29d |
| Downingtown Area | 9 | 102.5% | 26d |
| Coatesville Area | 5 | 104.8% | 7d |
| Ridley | 4 | 94.6% | 18d |
| Chichester | 4 | 98.8% | 38d |
| Christina | 3 | 98.8% | 16d |
| Rose Tree Media | 3 | 95.9% | 31d |
| Red Clay Consolidated | 3 | 103.2% | 4d |
| Upper Darby | 3 | 93.9% | 93d |
How to read these numbers
Numbers are the starting point. The conversation is what matters.
If a number on this page raises a question, ask us. If you want to understand how our results apply to your specific situation, that's what the first conversation is for.